Agency positioning. The cost of saying yes
Agency positioning becomes clearer when the work you accept matches what you want to be known for. Here are three practical ways to define that fit without making every enquiry a new strategic debate.
A business that does everything for everyone is, to most people looking in from outside, a business that stands for nothing in particular.
In the early years at Stems, we took on almost anything. A wedding, a corporate reception, a shop window display, a one-off funeral tribute, a bulk order for a hotel chain. Saying yes felt like good business sense and turning work away when you are still building something feels reckless. It took a long time to notice that saying yes to everything was quietly making it harder to say clearly, in one sentence, what we were actually known for.
This is not a demand problem. It is a positioning problem.
And it rarely feels like one from the inside, because every individual yes looks like sensible commercial judgement in the moment it is made.
Where agency positioning starts to drift
Positioning erodes one reasonable decision at a time. Each wrong-fit brief you accept is easy to justify on its own. It is only when you look back over eighteen months of them together that the pattern becomes obvious: the work has got broader, not sharper, and referrals have got vaguer, not more specific, because the people referring you can no longer describe in one sentence what you are actually for.
Why founders avoid narrowing it
- Saying no to work feels irresponsible, especially in a business with feast-and-famine cash flow, where any income can feel too valuable to turn down.
- Niching down feels risky, like deliberately shrinking the pool of people who could ever hire you, even though the opposite is usually true.
- Nobody has ever asked the founder to write the positioning down. It stays a vague sense rather than a specific, testable sentence they can hold work up against.
What it is quietly costing you
- Pricing power weakens. A generalist is easy to compare on cost. A specialist rarely is.
- Referrals get harder to give. The people who would refer you cannot describe in a sentence what you are actually best at.
- The work gets less efficient and less satisfying, because every project starts closer to zero instead of building on real, repeated expertise.
A business that will do anything for anyone is remembered by almost no one for anything in particular.
What your thinking style has to do with it
- Driver: says yes to the fastest available revenue, and treats positioning as a strategic exercise for later, which arrives less often than planned.
- Navigator: can see multiple future directions for the business clearly, and struggles to commit to closing any of them off, so positioning stays broad by default.
- Connector: takes on wrong-fit work rather than disappoint a referrer or an existing client asking for something just outside the lane.
- Analyst: may build an excellent positioning statement, then keep making exceptions to it under commercial pressure until it stops describing what the business actually does.
3 steps to sharpen your agency positioning
Clear agency positioning gives you a written standard for choosing projects and responding to work that falls outside your specialism.
The coaching side names why broad has felt safer than sharp. The operational side is actually defining the two or three kinds of work worth saying yes to, and building the client-facing language to hold that line when a tempting but wrong-fit brief lands.
- A one-sentence description of the work you actually want to be known for, specific enough that it excludes something.
- A short, honest audit of the last five projects, marked on-positioning or off, to see the pattern rather than guess at it.
- A simple, prepared response for the next wrong-fit enquiry, so the decision is not made from scratch under pressure.
This is the sibling problem to why agencies say yes to everything earlier in the series – that piece is about volume and capacity, this one is about fit. Positioning and pricing are closely tangled, which is where the Sharp Focus Pricing with Confidence session comes in.
It took us years to be able to say, in one sentence, what we were actually for. Once we could, the work got both easier and better.
Revisit your agency positioning against the work you actually deliver, so referrals and pricing reflect the expertise you want to build.
Further reading
Blair Enns' The Win Without Pitching Manifesto is written specifically for creative businesses, and makes the case for specialisation better than almost anything else in the genre.